Can You Use the Word I in an Argumentative Essay? Why Pineapples Don't Belong on Pizza

When it comes to writing an argumentative essay, one of the most debated topics is whether or not to use the word “I.” Some argue that it makes the essay too personal, while others believe it adds authenticity and clarity. But let’s take a step back and consider why pineapples don’t belong on pizza—because, somehow, these two topics are more connected than you might think.
The Case for Using “I” in Argumentative Essays
Using the word “I” in an argumentative essay can be a powerful tool. It allows the writer to take ownership of their arguments and present them as personal convictions rather than detached observations. For instance, if I were to argue that climate change is the most pressing issue of our time, saying “I believe” or “I argue” adds a layer of sincerity and passion to the essay. It humanizes the writer and makes the argument more relatable.
However, critics argue that using “I” can undermine the objectivity of the essay. They claim that an argumentative essay should rely on facts, logic, and evidence, not personal opinions. But isn’t all writing, at its core, a reflection of the writer’s perspective? Even when we avoid using “I,” our biases and beliefs still shape the arguments we present. So why not embrace it?
The Pineapple Pizza Paradox
Now, let’s pivot to the controversial topic of pineapple on pizza. Some people love it, while others consider it an abomination. But here’s the thing: the debate over pineapple pizza mirrors the debate over using “I” in essays. Both are about personal preference versus tradition, subjectivity versus objectivity.
Those who oppose pineapple on pizza often argue that it disrupts the balance of flavors. They claim that pizza should be savory, not sweet. But isn’t this just a matter of personal taste? Similarly, those who oppose using “I” in essays argue that it disrupts the formal tone. But isn’t this just a matter of stylistic preference?
The Intersection of Personal and Universal
The truth is, both debates boil down to the tension between the personal and the universal. In writing, using “I” can make an argument feel more personal, but it can also make it more universal by connecting with readers on a human level. Similarly, pineapple on pizza might not be for everyone, but for those who enjoy it, it represents a unique blend of flavors that challenges traditional norms.
In the end, whether you use “I” in your essay or put pineapple on your pizza is a matter of choice. Both decisions reflect your individuality and your willingness to challenge conventions. And isn’t that what argumentative writing—and life—is all about?
Related Q&A
Q: Can using “I” in an argumentative essay make it less formal?
A: It can, but it also adds a personal touch that can make your argument more compelling. The key is to strike a balance between formality and authenticity.
Q: Why do people hate pineapple on pizza so much?
A: It often comes down to a clash between sweet and savory flavors. Some people find the combination unsettling, while others enjoy the contrast.
Q: Is it okay to use “I” in academic writing?
A: It depends on the context and the guidelines of your assignment. In some cases, using “I” can strengthen your argument, but in others, it may be discouraged.
Q: What’s the best way to argue for or against pineapple on pizza?
A: Use evidence! For example, you could cite culinary traditions, flavor science, or even surveys about pizza preferences to support your argument.